Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 2700 is 1600 days newer than Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 2700 - 53 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700
- Performs up to 8% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Celeron G1820 - 181 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 16 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
181
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.55/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$280
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$280 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700 |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Haswell | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |