Key Differences
In short — FX-9370 outperforms Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-9370 is 173 days older than Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Consumes up to 76% less energy than AMD FX-9370 - 53 vs 220 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9370 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-9370
- Performs up to 0% better in Rocket League than Celeron G1820 - 675 vs 674 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 8 vs 2 threads
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Celeron G1820
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FX-9370
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | AMD FX-9370 |
|---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
| Celeron | Collection | FX |
| Haswell | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 220 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
