Buy on Amazon
CA$32.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7400 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-7400 is 1492 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i5-7400 - CA$32.99 vs CA$221.0
- Up to 83% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Core i5-7400 - CA$0.22 vs CA$1.26 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i5-7400 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400
- Performs up to 15% better in World of Warcraft than Celeron G1620 - 176 vs 153 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 4 vs 2 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
153
86.93181818181817%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.22/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$32.99
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G1620 CPU Used 2-Core 2-Thread Desktop Processor 2.7 GHz 2M 55W LGA1155
Buy for CA$32.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1578 minutes ago
Core i5-7400
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
176
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.26/FPS
17.46031746031746%
Price, CA$
CA$221
14%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i5-7400 3GHz 6MBNew Retail, BX80677I57400New Retail Smart Cache Box
Buy for CA$221 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1580 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i5-7400
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
34.77891156462585%
Multi-Core
723
22.370049504950494%
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Core i5-7400 |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
