Buy on Amazon
CA$32.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1620 outperforms Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1620 is 1492 days older than Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Celeron G1620 - 35 vs 55 Watts
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Intel Celeron G1620 CPU Used 2-Core 2-Thread Desktop Processor 2.7 GHz 2M 55W LGA1155
Buy for CA$32.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76519 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
74.63503649635037%
Multi-Core
723
76.26582278481013%
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 55 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
