Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10875H outperforms Celeron G1610T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10875H is 2677 days newer than Celeron G1610T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610T
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i7-10875H - 35 vs 45 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10875H
- Performs up to 6% better in Dead Space than Celeron G1610T - 152 vs 144 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610T - 16 vs 2 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1610T
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i7-10875H
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610T | vs | Intel Core i7-10875H |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2020 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel BGA 1440 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 45 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | No |
