Buy on Amazon
CA$21.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms Celeron G1610T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1002 days newer than Celeron G1610T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610T
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Celeron G3900 - 35 vs 51 Watts
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 5% better in World of Warcraft than Celeron G1610T - 158 vs 151 FPS
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
158
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.14/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$21.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Celeron G3900 2.8 Processor - Affordable and Reliable
Buy for CA$21.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 210 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Celeron G1610T
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610T | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.