Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1840 outperforms Celeron G1610T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1840 is 514 days newer than Celeron G1610T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610T
- Consumes up to 34% less energy than Intel Celeron G1840 - 35 vs 53 Watts
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Performs up to 2% better in Watch Dogs: Legion than Celeron G1610T - 126 vs 123 FPS
Watch Dogs: Legion
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
126
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.33/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$41.21
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$41.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 111 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610T | vs | Intel Celeron G1840 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 53 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |