Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700 outperforms Celeron G1610T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700 is 3409 days newer than Celeron G1610T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5700 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5700
- Performs up to 15% better in F1 22 than Celeron G1610T - 284 vs 248 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610T - 16 vs 2 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Celeron G1610T
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Ryzen 7 5700
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610T | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2022 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
