Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1610 outperforms Core i7-940 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1610 is 1477 days newer than Core i7-940.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Core i7-940 - 55 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-940 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-940
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 8 vs 2 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i7-940
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
95.30201342281879%
Multi-Core
739
48.237597911227155%
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i7-940 |
|---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 17th, 2008 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Bloomfield |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 130 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
