Buy on Amazon
CA$499
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3930K outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-3930K is 385 days older than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Core i7-3930K - 55 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3930K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3930K
- Performs up to 10% better in F1 23 than Celeron G1610 - 159 vs 145 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 12 vs 2 threads
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i7-3930K
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
FPS
159
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.14/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$499
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i7-3930K Hexa-Core Processor 3.2 Ghz 12 MB Cache LGA 2011 - BX80619I73930K
Buy for CA$499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 121 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i7-3930K
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i7-3930K |
|---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 14th, 2011 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Sandy Bridge E |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 2 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 130 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
