Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930T outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3930T is 1492 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Performs up to 2% better in Minecraft than Celeron G1610 - 611 vs 598 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 35 vs 55 Watts
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |