Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1840 outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1840 is 514 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Performs up to 1% better in Overwatch 2 than Celeron G1610 - 319 vs 317 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 53 vs 55 Watts
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
319
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.13/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$41.21
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$41.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44062 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
84.35643564356435%
Multi-Core
739
86.53395784543325%
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Celeron G1840 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 53 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |