Buy on Amazon
CA$2,000
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $1999
Availability
MSRP in USD: $1999
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is 2548 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 80% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 55 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
- Performs up to 63% better in F1 23 than Celeron G1610 - 237 vs 145 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 64 vs 2 threads
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
237
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$2000
100%
FPS Winner
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 32-Core, 64-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor, without Cooler
Buy for CA$2,000 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77024 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
26.03911980440098%
Multi-Core
739
5.275556824671616%
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Castle Peak |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 32 |
| 2 | Threads | 64 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 280 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
