Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700G outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700G is 3053 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5700G - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
- Performs up to 24% better in Alan Wake 2 than Celeron G1610 - 122 vs 98 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 16 vs 2 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Ryzen 7 5700G
Desktop • Apr 13th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
21.482602118003026%
Multi-Core
739
8.45537757437071%
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 5700G |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 13th, 2021 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Cezanne |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
