Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10750H outperforms Celeron B830 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10750H is 2770 days newer than Celeron B830.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B830
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i7-10750H - 35 vs 45 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10750H
- Performs up to 18% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Celeron B830 - 132 vs 112 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B830 - 12 vs 2 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2012
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B830 | vs | Intel Core i7-10750H |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel BGA 1440 |
Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 45 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics |
No | Overclockable | No |