Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3330 outperforms Celeron B830 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-3330 is 2 days newer than Celeron B830.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B830
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than Intel Core i5-3330 - 35 vs 77 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3330
- Performs up to 2% better in DOOM Eternal than Celeron B830 - 454 vs 443 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B830 - 4 vs 2 threads
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Celeron B830
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2012
Core i5-3330
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B830 | vs | Intel Core i5-3330 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 77 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
| Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
