Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4130 outperforms Celeron B830 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4130 is 365 days newer than Celeron B830.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B830
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Core i3-4130 - 35 vs 54 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130
- Performs up to 20% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Celeron B830 - 508 vs 422 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B830 - 4 vs 2 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron B830
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2012
Core i3-4130
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B830 | vs | Intel Core i3-4130 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
