Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700KF outperforms Celeron B820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-9700KF is 2382 days newer than Celeron B820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B820
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700KF - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700KF
- Performs up to 29% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Celeron B820 - 112 vs 87 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B820 - 8 vs 2 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
112
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.84/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$318.62
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$318.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 164 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jul 1st, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B820 | vs | Intel Core i7-9700KF |
---|---|---|
Jul 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |