Key Differences
In short — Core i7-940 outperforms Celeron 847 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-940 is 944 days older than Celeron 847.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 87% less energy than Intel Core i7-940 - 17 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-940 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-940
- Performs up to 19% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Celeron 847 - 234 vs 197 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 847 - 8 vs 2 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Celeron 847
Mobile • Jun 19th, 2011
Core i7-940
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 847 | vs | Intel Core i7-940 |
|---|---|---|
Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Nov 17th, 2008 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Bloomfield |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 130 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
| 11.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
