Key Differences
In short — Core i7-2600S outperforms Celeron 847 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-2600S is 161 days older than Celeron 847.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than Intel Core i7-2600S - 17 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600S
- Performs up to 7% better in Sea of Thieves than Celeron 847 - 208 vs 194 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 847 - 8 vs 2 threads
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Celeron 847
Mobile • Jun 19th, 2011
Core i7-2600S
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 847 | vs | Intel Core i7-2600S |
|---|---|---|
Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 11.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
