Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3700U outperforms Celeron 3965U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 3700U is 733 days newer than Celeron 3965U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
- Performs up to 4% better in Overwatch 2 than Celeron 3965U - 331 vs 317 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3965U - 8 vs 2 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Celeron 3965U
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Ryzen 7 3700U
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron 3965U
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
453
51.186440677966104%
Multi-Core
793
31.037181996086105%
Intel Celeron 3965U | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3700U |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 6th, 2019 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 15 W | TDP | 15 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 22.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| Intel HD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 10 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
