Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3950X outperforms Celeron 3865U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3950X is 1056 days newer than Celeron 3865U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3865U
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3950X - 15 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
- Performs up to 5% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Celeron 3865U - 220 vs 210 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3865U - 32 vs 2 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
220
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.04/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$889
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$889 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3865U | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3950X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |