Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7900X outperforms Celeron 3205U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-7900X is 848 days newer than Celeron 3205U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3205U
- Consumes up to 89% less energy than Intel Core i9-7900X - 15 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7900X
- Performs up to 98% better in FIFA 23 than Celeron 3205U - 162 vs 82 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3205U - 20 vs 2 threads
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron 3205U
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Core i9-7900X
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3205U | vs | Intel Core i9-7900X |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jun 26th, 2017 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
| Broadwell | Codename | Skylake-E/EP |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 10 |
| 2 | Threads | 20 |
| 1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 140 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 15.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
