Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3330 outperforms Celeron 3205U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-3330 is 909 days older than Celeron 3205U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3205U
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than Intel Core i5-3330 - 15 vs 77 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3330
- Performs up to 3% better in Elden Ring than Celeron 3205U - 112 vs 109 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3205U - 4 vs 2 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Celeron 3205U
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Core i5-3330
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3205U | vs | Intel Core i5-3330 |
|---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
| Broadwell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 15.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
