Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms Celeron 3205U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 184 days newer than Celeron 3205U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3205U
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than Intel Celeron G3900 - 15 vs 51 Watts
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 2% better in Valheim than Celeron 3205U - 191 vs 188 FPS
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
191
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.12/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$21.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$21.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 214 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3205U | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Broadwell | Codename | Skylake |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
15 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |