Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2950X outperforms Celeron 3205U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is 1279 days newer than Celeron 3205U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3205U
- Consumes up to 92% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 15 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
- Performs up to 12% better in Apex Legends than Celeron 3205U - 279 vs 250 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3205U - 32 vs 2 threads
Apex Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
FPS
279
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.23/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$1180.39
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$1,180.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15773 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3205U | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X |
---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Broadwell | Codename | Colfax |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |