Key Differences
In short — FX-8370 outperforms Celeron 3205U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-8370 is 180 days older than Celeron 3205U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3205U
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD FX-8370 - 15 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8370 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8370
- Performs up to 15% better in Assassin's Creed Mirage than Celeron 3205U - 69 vs 60 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3205U - 8 vs 2 threads
Assassin's Creed Mirage
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
FPS
69
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.19/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$220
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$220 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3205U | vs | AMD FX-8370 |
---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
Celeron | Collection | FX |
Broadwell | Codename | Vishera |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |