Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms Celeron 2955U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 2271 days newer than Celeron 2955U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 2955U
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Athlon 3000G - 15 vs 35 Watts
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 9% better in Valorant than Celeron 2955U - 729 vs 669 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 2955U - 4 vs 2 threads
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Celeron 2955U
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2013
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 2955U | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
| Celeron | Collection | Athlon |
| Haswell | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 1.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
15 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 14.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
