Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2950X outperforms Celeron 1037U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is 2049 days newer than Celeron 1037U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1037U
- Consumes up to 91% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 17 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
- Performs up to 13% better in Watch Dogs: Legion than Celeron 1037U - 139 vs 123 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1037U - 32 vs 2 threads
Watch Dogs: Legion
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
FPS
139
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$8.5/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$1181.07
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$1,181.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 101 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 1037U | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X |
---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Colfax |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |