Buy on Amazon
CA$254.71
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700 outperforms Celeron 1007U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6700 is 892 days newer than Celeron 1007U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1007U
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than Intel Core i7-6700 - 17 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700
- Performs up to 188% better in Immortals of Aveum than Celeron 1007U - 49 vs 17 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1007U - 8 vs 2 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-6700
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
FPS
49
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$5.2/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$254.71
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Boxed Core I7-6700 FC-LGA14C 3.40 GHz 8 M Processor Cache 4 LGA 1151 BX80662I76700
Buy for CA$254.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron 1007U
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Core i7-6700
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 1007U | vs | Intel Core i7-6700 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 1st, 2015 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 15.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Builds Using Celeron 1007U or Core i7-6700
Immortals of Aveum, 1920 x 1080, Ultra
1 FPS
CA$1099.99/FPS
GeForce RTX 3060
Core i7-6700
16 GB, 1 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
CA$1,099.99
In Stock
1 FPS
CA$1049.99/FPS
GeForce RTX 3060 8 GB
Core i7-6700
16 GB, 1 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
CA$1,049.99
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
