Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3500X outperforms Celeron 1007U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3500X is 2438 days newer than Celeron 1007U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1007U
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3500X - 17 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3500X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3500X
- Performs up to 83% better in Assassin's Creed Mirage than Celeron 1007U - 108 vs 59 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1007U - 6 vs 2 threads
Assassin's Creed Mirage
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Celeron 1007U
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Ryzen 5 3500X
Desktop • Sep 24th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron 1007U
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Single-Core
249
16.012861736334404%
Multi-Core
419
7.162393162393163%
Intel Celeron 1007U | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3500X |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 24th, 2019 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 2 | Threads | 6 |
| 1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 15.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
