Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1600X outperforms Celeron 1007U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 1600X is 1542 days newer than Celeron 1007U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1007U
- Consumes up to 82% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1600X - 17 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
- Performs up to 5% better in Halo Infinite than Celeron 1007U - 158 vs 150 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1007U - 12 vs 2 threads
Halo Infinite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
158
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.47/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$389.7
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$389.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10069 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 1007U | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600X |
---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |