Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900T outperforms Celeron 1000M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900T is 2284 days newer than Celeron 1000M.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900T
- Performs up to 19% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Celeron 1000M - 175 vs 147 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1000M - 16 vs 2 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron 1000M
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Core i9-9900T
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 1000M | vs | Intel Core i9-9900T |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 16 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
| 35 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
