Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms Celeron 1000M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 4005 days newer than Celeron 1000M.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1000M
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 63% better in Grand Theft Auto V than Celeron 1000M - 168 vs 103 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1000M - 32 vs 2 threads
Grand Theft Auto V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
168
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$5.08/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$853.13
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$853.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 214 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 1000M | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |