Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms Celeron 1000M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 3636 days newer than Celeron 1000M.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1000M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 56% better in Grand Theft Auto V than Celeron 1000M - 161 vs 103 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1000M - 32 vs 2 threads
Grand Theft Auto V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron 1000M
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Core i9-13900
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 1000M | vs | Intel Core i9-13900 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 24 |
| 2 | Threads | 32 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
