Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600XT outperforms Celeron 1000M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600XT is 2359 days newer than Celeron 1000M.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1000M
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT
- Performs up to 24% better in Lost Ark than Celeron 1000M - 268 vs 217 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1000M - 12 vs 2 threads
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
268
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.93/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$250
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$250 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 47 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 1000M | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT |
---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |