Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms the cheaper FX-9590 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-9590 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 2704 days newer than the cheaper FX-9590.
Advantages of FX-9590
- Up to 32% cheaper than Ryzen 9 5950X - CA$340.00 vs CA$499.00
- Up to 2% better value when playing Far Cry 3 than Ryzen 9 5950X - CA$2.79 vs CA$2.85 per FPS
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 43% better in Far Cry 3 than FX-9590 - 175 vs 122 FPS
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 105 vs 220 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-9590 - 32 vs 8 threads
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
FPS
122
70%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.79/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$340
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$340 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 126 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
175
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.85/FPS
98%
Price, CA$
CA$499
68%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 126 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-9590 | vs | Ryzen 9 5950X |
---|---|---|
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Vishera | Codename | Vermeer |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
4.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
220 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
23.5x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |