In Battlefield 6, the FX-9590 is quite a bit slower than the Core i9-10850K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
FX-9590
No clear advantages
Core i9-10850K
- Up to 46% faster in Battlefield 6 – 89 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 46% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 7 years and 1 month newer – Jul 27, 2020 vs Jun 11, 2013
- Is 7 years and 1 month newer
- Consumes up to 43% less energy – 125 vs 220 Watts
- Consumes up to 43% less energy
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
FX-9590 vs Core i9-10850K: Comparison of performance and price
FX-9590
Jun 11th, 2013
Average FPS
61 FPS
69%
Min 1% FPS
46 FPS
69%
Price, $
$282.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.62/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-9590 vs Core i9-10850K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-9590 vs Core i9-10850K in core CPU performance specifications
FX-9590
Jun 11th, 2013
Cores
8-core
80%
L3 Cache
8 MB
40%
Base Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
96%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
64%
Core i9-10850K
Jul 27th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
77%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-9590 Jun 11th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-10850K Jul 27th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 11th, 2013 | Released | Jul 27th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1200 |
| 220 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
