Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 7 7700 outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 7 7700 is 3735 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of FX-8350
- Up to 4% cheaper than Ryzen 7 7700 - CA$419.75 vs CA$438.98
Advantages of Ryzen 7 7700
- Performs up to 30% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-8350 - 219 vs 168 FPS
- Up to 20% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-8350 - CA$2.00 vs CA$2.50 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for CA$419.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 201 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
FPS
219
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$438.98
95%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$438.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 201 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-8350 | vs | Ryzen 7 7700 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Vishera | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |