Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms FX-8320E on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 3332 days newer than FX-8320E.
Advantages of Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 24% better in HITMAN 3 than FX-8320E - 233 vs 188 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320E - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320E doesn't have integrated graphics
HITMAN 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-8320E
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Core i9-14900K
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-8320E | vs | Core i9-14900K |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
| FX | Collection | Core i9 |
| Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 24 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 16.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
