The FX-8320E is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i7-4790K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the FX-8320E
The Core i7-4790K is better in every way
Advantages of the Core i7-4790K
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 7% less energy – 88 vs 95 Watts
FX-8320E vs Core i7-4790K for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
FX-8320E
Sep 2nd, 2014
Average FPS
167
90%
Min 1% FPS
112
91%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i7-4790K
May 1st, 2014
Average FPS
186
100%
Min 1% FPS
123
100%
Price, CA$
CA$192.03
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.03/FPS
100%
FX-8320E vs Core i7-4790K in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8320E vs Core i7-4790K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8320E vs Core i7-4790K in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8320E
Sep 2nd, 2014
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
80%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
91%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Core i7-4790K
May 1st, 2014
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
86%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-8320E | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i7-4790K |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
$147.00 | MSRP | $350.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
| Vishera | Codename | Haswell |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 88 W |
| Performance | ||
8 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Frequency | 4.0 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.4 GHz |
| 8 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1866 MHz | RAM | DDR3 @ 1600 MHz |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
