Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400 outperforms FX-8320E on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12400 is 2681 days newer than FX-8320E.
Advantages of Core i5-12400
- Performs up to 10% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than FX-8320E - 164 vs 149 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8320E - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320E - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320E doesn't have integrated graphics
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
FX-8320E
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Core i5-12400
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-8320E | vs | Core i5-12400 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| FX | Collection | Core i5 |
| Vishera | Codename | Alder Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 16.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
