The FX-8320E is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i3-10300. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the FX-8320E
The Core i3-10300 is better in every way
Advantages of the Core i3-10300
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
FX-8320E vs Core i3-10300 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
FX-8320E
Sep 2nd, 2014
Average FPS
167
88%
Min 1% FPS
112
90%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i3-10300
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
189
100%
Min 1% FPS
125
100%
Price, CA$
CA$263.63
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.39/FPS
100%
FX-8320E vs Core i3-10300 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8320E vs Core i3-10300 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8320E vs Core i3-10300 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8320E
Sep 2nd, 2014
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
91%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
70%
Core i3-10300
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-8320E | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i3-10300 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| $147.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
| Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
8 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.7 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.4 GHz |
| 8 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1866 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2666 MHz |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
