The FX-8320E is a much slower gaming CPU than the Celeron G4900. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the FX-8320E
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of the Celeron G4900
- A much faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 43% less energy – 54 vs 95 Watts
FX-8320E vs Celeron G4900 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
FX-8320E
Sep 2nd, 2014
Average FPS
167
98%
Min 1% FPS
112
98%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Celeron G4900
Apr 3rd, 2018
Average FPS
170
100%
Min 1% FPS
114
100%
Price, CA$
CA$98.88
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.58/FPS
100%
FX-8320E vs Celeron G4900 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8320E vs Celeron G4900 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8320E vs Celeron G4900 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8320E
Sep 2nd, 2014
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
78%
Celeron G4900
Apr 3rd, 2018
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
2 MB
25%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-8320E | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Celeron G4900 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
| $147.00 | MSRP | $42.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
| Vishera | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 54 W |
| Performance | ||
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.2 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.1 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 2 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1866 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2400 MHz |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
