In Battlefield 6, the FX-8320 is quite a bit slower than the Core i9-12900F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
FX-8320
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-12900F
- Up to 90% faster in Battlefield 6 – 116 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 90% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 9 years and 2 months newer – Jan 04, 2022 vs Oct 23, 2012
- Is 9 years and 2 months newer
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
FX-8320 vs Core i9-12900F: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8320
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
61 FPS
53%
Min 1% FPS
46 FPS
53%
Price, $
$88.1
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.44/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8320 vs Core i9-12900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8320 vs Core i9-12900F in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8320
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
27%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
78%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-12900F
Jan 4th, 2022
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
69%
Turbo Frequency
5.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8320 Oct 23rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-12900F Jan 4th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Released | Jan 4th, 2022 |
$169.00 | MSRP | $494.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
