The FX-8320 is at least much slower gaming CPU than the Core i7-4765T. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the FX-8320
The Core i7-4765T is better in every way
Advantages of the Core i7-4765T
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
FX-8320 vs Core i7-4765T for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
FX-8320
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
167
95%
Min 1% FPS
112
95%
Price, CA$
CA$64.51
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.38/FPS
100%
Core i7-4765T
Jun 2nd, 2013
Average FPS
176
100%
Min 1% FPS
118
100%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
FX-8320 vs Core i7-4765T in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8320 vs Core i7-4765T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8320 vs Core i7-4765T in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8320
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-4765T
Jun 2nd, 2013
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
57%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
81%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-8320 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i7-4765T |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
$169.00 | MSRP | $303.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
| Vishera | Codename | Haswell |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Performance | ||
8 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.0 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.0 GHz |
| 8 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | DDR3 @ 1600 MHz |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
