FX-8320 vs Core i5-14400F in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
The FX-8320 is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i5-14400F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the FX-8320
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
Advantages of the Core i5-14400F
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 16 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 FPS Calculator
The CPU's performance with selected game settings
FX-8320
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
181
80%
Min 1% FPS
126
82%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i5-14400F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
226
100%
Min 1% FPS
154
100%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8320 vs Core i5-14400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8320 vs Core i5-14400F in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8320
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
80%
L3 Cache
8 MB
40%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
85%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-14400F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
71%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8320 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-14400F |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
$169.00 | MSRP | $196.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 4800 MHz |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | No |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
