Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-12600K outperforms the more expensive FX-8320 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-12600K is 3299 days newer than the more expensive FX-8320.
Advantages of Core i5-12600K
- Performs up to 26% better in Battlefield 2042 than FX-8320 - 181 vs 144 FPS
- Up to 22% cheaper than FX-8320 - CA$249.00 vs CA$317.97
- Up to 38% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than FX-8320 - CA$1.38 vs CA$2.21 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$317.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7474 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
181
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.38/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$249
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$249 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7474 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-8320 | vs | Core i5-12600K |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |