Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 4011 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of FX-8300
- Up to 70% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - CA$207.92 vs CA$696.59
- Up to 64% better value when playing Apex Legends than Core i9-14900KF - CA$0.81 vs CA$2.28 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 19% better in Apex Legends than FX-8300 - 305 vs 256 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8300 - 32 vs 8 threads
Apex Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
256
84%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.81/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$207.92
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$207.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 187 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
305
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.28/FPS
36%
Price, CA$
CA$696.59
29%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$696.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 186 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-8300 | vs | Core i9-14900KF |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |