Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700KF outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700KF is 4011 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of FX-8300
- Up to 56% cheaper than Core i7-14700KF - CA$207.92 vs CA$469.00
- Up to 37% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-14700KF - CA$1.38 vs CA$2.18 per FPS
Advantages of Core i7-14700KF
- Performs up to 42% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than FX-8300 - 215 vs 151 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8300 - 28 vs 8 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
151
70%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.38/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$207.92
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$207.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 164 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
215
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.18/FPS
63%
Price, CA$
CA$469
44%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$469 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 164 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-8300 | vs | Core i7-14700KF |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 20 |
8 | Threads | 28 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |